Does anonymity on the web give people too much freedom to torment Essay

Does anonymity on the web give people too much freedom to torment others - Essay Example Potential victims are also protected this way. Patients and parents, for instance, can talk about sensitive matters in open forums (Milner). Victims of discrimination and crimes can also speak out anonymously. Nowadays, there are uncountable chat rooms where people get to speak openly of how they feel about their jobs, spouses and even lifestyles. The debate on gender equality, for example, saw many women and men express themselves. Both uncivil and polite responses were accepted in the forum. This made it easy to reach quick decisions by hosts. As Milner claims, Anonymity can empower those who seek consolation and justice to speak out .Victims of rape, for example, can talk about their ordeal without the fear of rejection or shame. On the other hand, anonymous people can intimidate other web users or even go as far as stalking them. Bias motivated stalking and sexual invasion of privacy are a major menace that come with anonymity. The two interfere with other peoples employment and general lifestyle. People get a chance to be heard on the web through Anonymity. Before the invention of the internet, only influential people were fortunate enough to be listened to. Anonymity also ensures the protection of Democracy and civilian rights. Discussing political matters without anonymity would not be possible. This is because politicians are very influential people and therefore common individuals would not risk confrontation by expressing their views. People get to know what other people think concerning particular issues. On the other hand, people can take advantage and misuse their freedom of expression to hurt and threaten others on the web, an act called trolling. Trolling can be offensive, disturbing and at times shocking. Anonymity on the web only gives web users enough freedom to express themselves. Anonymity does not give people freedom to torment others. It is a privilege that needs not be interfered with. As

2012 Efforts to remove evolution from textbooks in South Korea Case Study

2012 Efforts to remove evolution from textbooks in South Korea - Case Study Example This announcement and step by government in collaboration with creationist group has been greeted with criticism by the biologist and the entire scientific fraternity in South Korea and also they have support from some theologians who reason that simply learning the evolution theory does not mean that the students will follow and believe in it. With the removal of the evolution theory, students will only learn about creation theory which coincides with the large population of this nation being Christians. It will also narrow down the view of the world since its inception by the students and they may find it hard later on in life when they leave the country and start interacting with scientists all over the world who still hold dear the evolution theory. Creationism is therefore viewed as the only theory and hence becoming more powerful and acknowledged even